Search for: "NZ Innovative Health Technologies Limited"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 pm
A recent study suggested that ‘the design and strength of intellectual property systems should be tailored to the indigenous technological capabilities of firms in order to best provide the appropriate incentive for innovation’. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
It means agreeing to follow limits such as time temperature cooking combinations, conditions or options in the plan. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (Spicy IP), India: DCGI preparing document to implement patent-registration linkage: (Spicy IP), New Zealand: Generic pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of NZ IP laws and medicines regulations: (International Law Office), Uganda: Cipla licenses ARV technology into Uganda: (Afro-IP), US: Money saved through generic prescriptions: (GenericsWeb), US: Government plans to keep close tab on drug patent settlements: (GenericsWeb), US: FTC reports 14 deals to delay generics in… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IP finance) Armenia Armenia proposes to get tough with infringers (1709 Blog) Australia Peer-to-patent Australia (ipwars) (IPKat) Australian Senator Kate Lundy on ACTA (Michael Geist) Ramficiations of IceTV – no copyright in medical records - Primary Health Care Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (ipwars.com) The onus on appeal from a trade mark opposition: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP (ipwars) 2003 Designs Act appeal: Keller v LED… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
He has been telling Canadians it will “kill digital policy,” create a “digital policy failure,” potentially “cripple” the backbone of the innovation economy, and put health care data at risk, among other things, citing primarily the intellectual property and e-commerce chapters as the reasons why. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But it wasn't just technology vs content: two major platforms, Spotify and Deezer, urged European legislators to ensure that the globally dominant giant US technology companies (primarily Apple, Amazon and Google) don't abuse their position as gatekeepers to digital consumers, not least as all three tech giants make and operate devices, control transaction platforms and own content services. [read post]
